Friday, November 15, 2019

The Polemic about Tattoos :: essays research papers fc

The polemic about tattoos I was wondering why tattoos are a controversial point in our society! There are people against and people that really like tattoos, but who is right? Should I think it is a good or a bad thing? Maybe for the tattooists the art involves is worth the pain and sacrifice of being tattooed. For the religious, it is a sin to sacrifice one’s body with so meaningless purpose. Now I don’t think there are excuses to justify so drastic a way of art, but analyzing the points of view I will try to clarify some questions I still have about this body art such as the reason people have tattoos, â€Å"When did tattooing start?†, the dangers involved in this procedure, the removal of a tattoo and society’s reaction to tattooed persons. Thinking it is weird to have one’s body penetrated many times by a needle to make only a drawing I do not think is worth it. So, why do people have tattoos? Why it is a common place nowadays? Probably because people see that the tattoo is a way of expression, but the real motivation to acquire it varies among groups and cultures. It marks thoughts, opinions, memories†¦Some persons obtains tattoos as a means of asserting their personal identity or sexual orientation. Tattoos may be a testament to feelings of love, they have been associated with rites of passage and identification with groups. Nowadays tattoos is used for some cosmetic medical procedures and permanent make-up applications, according to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences’ web site. Some women seek facial tattooing as method of permanent adornment that reduces the need of cosmetics, what can be helpful when, for example, a compromised vision impairs the ability to apply make-up. Talking with a friend who likes a lot of body art, Manoela Cunha, she said: â€Å"I like tattoos because they make me feel â€Å"the one†! There is no one else in the world like me it is a way of identification†. She adds: â€Å"It is not a rebellion of thoughts, it’s just something I like and I really don’t care about other peoples judgment†. She said it is not a painful thing, none of her 3 tattoos and her piercing hurt, and she is planning to get others. Analyzing the past, I can see it is not a recent thing. I read once in a web site about frequently asked

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Alice Walker s everyday use

Johnny's point of view to make it easier for us, the readers, to understand the plot or purpose of the story. Alice Walker wants us to know more about Mrs.. Johnny's background, a hard working black single mother of two from back then (asses). She struggled all her life for her two daughters, Dee and Maggie; both very different from each other. Mrs..Johnson is brutally honest when describing her two daughters and even herself. She calls herself a â€Å"large, big-boned woman with rough man-working hands†. Often comparing herself to a man doing masculine things because of how hard she works on her property, she kills and cleans hogs, wearing flannel pajamas and overalls †¦ All these reflect a strong, capable and independent mother, even though she lacks of certain education. If the story was to be told from a neutral third person point of view there wouldn't be much of an impact to the theme of the story, heritage.You have Mrs.. Johnson who feels strong about her heritage and Dee who tries to disguise It with the new persona she's created. Coming from a neutral point of view you wouldn't get a feel on how strongly Mrs.. Johnson feels about her heritage since It's not coming from her directly. Details would also be left out, like how Mrs.. Johnson describes herself and a true explanation on the connection she has with her daughters. If the story would have been told from Deed's point of view, we had missed all this Information from Mrs..Johnny's heritage (black woman heritage). Dee Is a very educated, arrogant, selfish, and a determined person. Her knowledge and education has only been used to put other people down, Like she did with her mom, sister and friends. Dee changed her own name to Wanders; she said that she felt oppressed by the people who first name her. Dee didn't even remember where her name came from, or her uncle's names who she still showed some kind of respect for when she remembered him carve the butter chum from a tree they used to h ave.Dee reflects those people who reject their own roots. When Wanders and Yakima-a- barber got to Mrs.. Johnny's home, they seemed Like strangers that didn't belong there. They behaved worse than Ignorant tourists, snapping pictures and getting Intrigued by Mrs.. Johnson and Magpie's rustic realism Like In a documentary, Instead of honoring and embracing the hard work of their own people, their own family. Everyday Use by Alice Walker Mrs.. Johnson who feels strong about her heritage and Dee who tries to disguise it oldest get a feel on how strongly Mrs..Johnson feels about her heritage since it's all this information from Mrs.. Johnny's heritage (black woman heritage). Dee is a education has only been used to put other people down, like she did with her mom, barber got to Mrs.. Johnny's home, they seemed like strangers that didn't belong there. They behaved worse than ignorant tourists, snapping pictures and getting intrigued by Mrs.. Johnson and Magpie's rustic realism like in a documentary, instead

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Self

We tested this evolutionary hypothesis on 166 college students by measuring self-deception using both a questionnaire and a series of hypothetical helping scenarios. The results showed a positive correlation between self-deception and moral oscilloscope, which was moderated by private self-consciousness. Among participants with high, but not low, self- consciousness, high moral self-concept individuals were more willing to help hen potential selflessness were present than low moral self-concept individuals, whereas there was no difference between the two groups concerning helping without self-benefit.These results support the evolutionary view that self-deception serves to maintain optimal moral self- concept, especially for individuals with high solicitousness. ? 201 1 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Humans are social animals who pursue selfish interests in a cooperative context in which public interests are also observed. There are subsequent conflicts between pu rsuing self-interests and protecting public interests. Solving and balancing these conflicts has resulted in specific adaptations to group living.On the one hand, various group-oriented colonization processes help to shape the development of moral self-concept among group members that serves to maintain the cooperative group context by curbing selfish interests and promoting public interests. Individuals of high moral self- concept thus behave more altruistically. On the other hand, altruism operates among other adaptive forces, such as deception and self-deception, which allow one to claim or believe to be acting altruistically while actually acting elfish (Commodes & Toby, 2005; Cummins, 1999; von Hippie & T rivers, 201 1; Drivers, 1976).In deception, self-interests replace public interests in the conscious mind; in self-deception, self-interests are pushed to the unconscious and the individual is Only aware of public interests (Alexander, 1987). The factor regulating deception an d self-deception may be self- consciousness, which is the extent to which individuals are inclined and able to examine their inner thoughts and feelings (Finessing, Cashier, & Buss, 1975). Low moral self-concept individuals may openly deceive others by maintaining Corresponding author. Address: Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese university of Hong Kong, Satin, N. T. Hong Kong. Tell. : +852 2609 6936; fax: +852 2603 6921. E-mail add [email  protected] Du. Husk (L. Change). 0191-8869/$ – see front matter ? 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI:1 0. 1 016/j. Paid. 2011. 07. 014 self-interests in the conscious mind, while high moral self-concept individuals may self-deceive by pushing self-interests to the unconscious. Self; consciousness may serve to regulate these two silvering strategies. The purpose of the present study is to examine the relations among moral self- incept, self-consciousness, and self-deception in an effort to better understand self-dec eption within an evolutionary framework.Unlike philosophers who are concerned about the existence, realization, and intentionality of self-deception (e. G. , Davidson, 1985; Demos, 1960; Vinaigrette, 1969; Melee, 1 997), or mainstream psychologists who focus on the mechanism and functionality of self-deception (e. G. , Greenland, 1988; Smacked, 1983; Phallus & John, 1 998), evolutionary psychologists are interested in how self-deception has evolved as a fitness-enhancing strategy.The evolutionary view holds that self-deception has evolved in an uncongenial world as a result of an â€Å"arms race† between deception and deception detection (Drivers, 2000). In human group living, conflicts of interest are present most of the time (Alexander, 1987), and deception has become a ubiquitous strategy to manipulate group members in order to maximize self- interest and exploit public interests (Mitchell, 1 986; Drivers, 1985). Detection of deception evolves to guard against personal exp loitation and public encroachment. In response, self-deception evolves to escape detection.During deception, maintaining both true and false information in the consciousness while presenting only falsehoods to others results in extra cognitive load for the deceiver (von Hippie & Drivers, 201 1). Conscious awareness about the truth may result in the deceiver unintentionally exposing clues about the truth. A self-deceiver keeps only false information in the consciousness H. J. Lu, L. Change / personality and Individual Differences 51 (2011) 845-849 and leaves no clues about the truth, which is kept in the unconscious, and thus avoids detection completely (Drivers, 2000).Whereas self-deception was originally construed mainly as an interpersonal strategy to facilitate deception of others (Drivers, 1976, 1985), it also is an interpersonal variable that, as part of the self-system, entails chronic misrepresentation of the self without immediate or explicit reference to others (Exurban & S kittish, 2007; Surrey, 201 1; von Hippie & Drivers 2011). In such a self-directed and deceptive state of mind, a person may selectively access certain information about, and deny other information to, the self in ways that convince both the self and others of aggrandize clarifications (Greenland, 1 988; Phallus & Reid, 1991Interpersonal self-deception therefore continues to serve the interpersonal goal of deceiving others (von Hippie & Drivers, 201 1). Consistent with the interpersonal origin of self-deception, preferential access to, and misrepresentation of, different aspects of the self are fashioned by active interpersonal interactions within a group context that informs the individual of his/her fitness conditions, including cooperation needs and opportunities.Often referred to as selfsameness in morality or altruism (Phallus & John, 1998), interpersonal self-deception is self-serving because it facilitates and maintains cooperative relationships with other group members (Surre y, 2004; Surrey & McNally, 1997). Individuals are more inclined to be altruistic if they are unaware of the selfish intentions of themselves and others (Nesses & Lloyd, 1 992; Surrey, 2011). By the same logic, congenial altruism suppresses selfishness and engenders altruism in others, which actuates and perpetuates reciprocal altruism and cooperative group living (Alexander, 1987).As part of the self-system that emphasizes proportioning, representing, and misrepresenting different aspects of the self (Markus & Hurl, 1987), interpersonal self-deception contributes to the development and maintenance of self-concept (Greenland, 1 980; Skidded & Crosslink, 1997), specifically the moral or altruistic aspects of self-concept relevant to social interactions and group living. Being altruistic and unselfish, and seeing others behaving likewise, is a core feature of colonization in most societies (Keller, Deleting, Sauerkraut, If-xi, & Ge, 2005).This colonization, in turn, shapes and reinforc es individuals' self-concept, specifically the moral self- concept. Interpersonal self-deception is thus vital to self-conception because t enables or facilitates the initialization of group or altruistic values that help form an individual's moral self-concept. Thus, there is a functional association between moral self-concept and self-deception; regarding oneself highly in terms of morality and altruism necessitates that negative and selfish aspects of the self are inaccessible, and this is achieved through self- deception.In this respect, self-deception is necessary for, and instrumental to, the development and maintenance of moral oscilloscope. In other words, people attaining or maintaining high moral ground may be more self- exceptive and, thus, more successful in suppressing selfish thoughts, whereas people of low moral self-concept view themselves in less-than- optimal moral light because they are not inclined to deceive themselves about their selfish thoughts.Whether or not self-deception is used to maintain high moral ground may depend on one's ability to attend to inner thoughts and feelings, including the morally undesirable aspects of the self. Such self-consciousness, especially private self-consciousness, may serve to regulate self-deception. Highly self-conscious individuals are more aware of their inner self (Finessing et al. 1 975), including blemishes in their moral self- conception. To maintain the same level of moral self-concept, these individuals will require more interpersonal self-deception to suppress moral imperfections.In contrast, the moral self-concept of those low in self- consciousness may depend less on self-deception because they are less aware of their inner selves, including selfish thoughts and moral impurities. Thus, increasing self-consciousness may increase the strength of the correlation between moral self-concept and self-deception. To test the hypothesis that self-deception facilitates the maintenance of oral self-con cept by suppressing negative aspects of the self, the present study examined the associations among selections (SIDE), moral self- concept (MS), and self-consciousness (SC).We hypothesized a positive correlation between moral oscilloscope and self-deception. We also expected MS-SIDE association to be stronger among high, rather than low, self- conscious individuals. In addition to examining questionnaire measures, we also included another measure of self-deception by having subjects respond to different helping scenarios from which we derived two helping intention rabbles – altruistic helping intention without self-benefit and self-deceived helping intention with potential self-benefit.

Friday, November 8, 2019

buy custom Honour Code at University of Colorado essay

buy custom Honour Code at University of Colorado essay Honour code at university of Colorado An honour code or system is a set of rules and tenets that guide and govern a particular group of people or community on the basis of ideal principles which define what is an honourable code of conduct and behaviour. An honour code just like rules and regulation defines what acceptable behaviour within a given community is. The violators of a code of honour usually faces disciplinary measure such as suspension or expulsion from the university. Universities and several institutions such as military academies use honour codes to curb to dishonesty and hence foster honesty and integrity. Majority of the code of honors discourage stealing, cheating or any other misconduct within an institution. The foundation of honor code can be traced back in 1779, were it was first established and implemented at the college of William and Mary in Virginia. The honor code first started with individual commitment, followed by the principles or ideals and finally the commitment to watch over other students. Honor code aims at minimizing corrosive academic dishonesty and helps in improving the quality of degree one is doing and at the end improving individuals life (John, 2004). Unlike the Hampden-Sydney College honor code which is compared with the military one, University of Colorado honor code encourages and support dialogue between the teachers and students. Hampden-Sydney College applies its honor code both at school and at home. Like the military abetting violation is as well as violating the code of honor. Strict code of honor is also applied at Brigham young university. The cod e of honor not only encourages honest academic behavior, limits an individual student on drinking of alcohol, drug abuse and smoking, grooming standards and sex life. However, there are other universities and colleges which have encouraged students to run their own honor code so as to enhance students participation. Such colleges include university of Texas, Princeton University, university of Colorado, University of Mary Washington Vanderbilt University and many others. This tries to instill in students personal discipline since our world requires professionals who can deliver quality work under minimum supervision. By giving students the freedom to identify certain norms and principles to guide their actions, they give them the ability to influence not only their lives but that of others. Abraham Lincoln one said that the way to make men trustable is to trust them. This philosophy therefore has strong roots and has been acknowledged as workable and indeed highly beneficial to the concerned parties. While other universities extend their code of honor outside their universities, University of Colorado honor code only works within the school thus providing freedom to the students to decide how to carry themselves outside the confines of the institution. However, this freedom should not be used as a conduit for participating in illegal activities since doing so is in direct violation of the honor code. Needless to say that whatever a stuent does outside should not affect his performance within the school and when such a conflict of interest occurs, the student must choose between school and the outside world (Appiah, 2010). At the University of Colorado, plagiarism, cheating and fabrication had become widespread among the student in the university community creating a culture of dishonesty and thus affecting the credibility and quality of the university degree. In an effort to reduce such habits the university council came up with the guidelines to reduce academic dishonesty and hence foster positive culture and attitude towards academic excellence. One of the salient features of the honor code at the university is that it is student run. This means that each student is responsible or accountable to another. However, students may develop negative attitude towards each other, especially those who report the violators of the honor code. Nevertheless, with the establishment of good communication channel within the university may reduce the chances of knowing the reporter. Integrating university policies with the syllabus is a greater step in closing the gap between the administration expectation and the student anticipation. Honor code being a significant social contract which is a basis for harmony and integrity within the university, it is a vital tool in creating awareness and creating conducive and favorable condition for dialogue hence enhancing and improving individuals integrity. The application of honor code accrues many benefits both inside the institution and outside environment. An honor code instills positive character traits and behavior such as honesty, trust and integrity can be applied outside the University of Colorado. This will lead in creating quality graduates who are creative and honest even as they join the mainstream world and assigned bigger responsibilities. A good example is the honor code of the Anschutz Medical Campus which discourages student from participating in any activity related to drinking of alcohol and drug abuse. This is because such activities are unprofessional and does not align well with bright prospects for a successful future. With the honor code in place, it guides students in their journey to become professionals with a deep rooted sense of integrity. In doing so, the University of Colorado will gain recognition as a center for excellence where students are not only taught the programs they enroll but are guided in a m anner that produces people of integrity, principles and strong leaders. Honor code helps students to be creative and participate more in research work. By doing this it will help them avoid plagiarism and hence a good culture of reading. With provision of more work from teachers and guiding them on how to do research students will engage more with the teachers thus creating rapport (John, 2004). This rapport will enhance honest participation and therefore developing integrity. In this regard, enforcement of honor codes motivates students to achieve excellence and succeed in fulfilling the requirements of their course in a credible manner. Academic disshonesty may be described as any activity that may lead to unfair competition or create disadvantage over the other students. Such activities include plagiarism, cheating, lying, fabrication, bribery and threat. Involving in such activities, leads to the violation of honor code at Colorado University hence watering down the quality and integrity of my degree course. Engaging in the aforementioned activities leads to personal harm as the dangers of getting caught are severe. It will be devastating to loose ones place at the university and this act would make getting a similar chance in other reputable universities highly improbable. The degree awarded by Colorado University requires students to engage in intense research work to be able to bring positive change within the university community. This implies that, misinterpretation of truth, taking of another persons property without permission, copying, illegal collaboration and sharing of information during examination will make my degree course not meet the required standards. Assisting others to cheat or circumvent the rules is detrimental to the person being aided and a serious violation of the university rules and honor code. This in the long run will affect the individual student and the quality of degree being offered by Colorado University. In addition, it might perpetuate a culture of laziness and erode the reputation of the university in the long run. Since we have been mandated and given the collective responsibility to run and protect the honor code, we are able to take immediate action to prevent violations and discourage students from engaging in dishonest academic activities. We should strive to conduct myself in manner that reflects integrity especially during exams and other related affairs. It is also a part of every students responsibility to discourage those who would attempt to cheat and report those who refuse to head warnings. This is because aiding in cheating or engaging in cheating is detrimental top oneself, to others within the university and to society in general. Should other students realize that others are outperforming them based on cheating and plagiarism, it might foster an attitude of disconnect and disillusionment. The effect might be increased cheating as other students adopt the same behavior. In conclusion, it is necessary to highlight that honor codes are a vital part of any institution since it guides its members on how to act in a moral way. Universities are institutions of higher learning where students are not only expected to acquire skills but to demonstrate the use of their acquired skills. Some students have a habit of wasting time or seek short cuts rather than follow the expected routine in satisfying the requirements of their programs. They would rather cheat rather than do their best to study and conduct research and acquire merits which they do not deserve. Honor codes try to dissuade students form those kinds of acts since they are detrimental to themselves and to their institutions. An institution where students follow rules and observe codes of conduct are places where excellence and harmony thrives. Buy custom Honour Code at University of Colorado essay

Tuesday, November 5, 2019

Sinewy and Sinuous

Sinewy and Sinuous Sinewy and Sinuous Sinewy and Sinuous By Maeve Maddox In the context of anatomy, a sinew is â€Å"a strong fibrous cord serving to connect a muscle with a bone or other part.† Figuratively, usually in the plural, sinew connotes strength, as in this much-repeated quotation from Cicero: The sinews of war  are infinite money. The adjective for sinew is sinewy. When I hear or read the word sinewy applied to a person, I think of muscles, strength, and healthy leanness. In the context of cooking, sinewy is applied to cuts of meat. Sinewy meat is usually tough. Used figuratively, sinewy connotes strength and masculinity. Here are examples of both literal and figurative uses of the adjective sinewy: The sinewy  horsemen, as daring as the Crusaders who invaded the Holy Land, seemed to be everywhere. At Bondoni was Percival, a tall,  sinewy  man, a fine rider and shot.   He had taken his coat off and had rolled up his shirtsleeves, revealing  sinewy white  arms covered in freckles. The shank comes from the upper leg portion of the cow. Since this is a very well exercised part of the body, the meat is lower in fat and tends to be sinewy and dry. Unlike beech, it has broad ridges that curve up and around the trunk and branches, resembling  a sinewy, muscular arm.   Jacques Barzun praised Stout for his â€Å"sinewy, pellucid, propelling prose,† which seems to me to get it exactly right. Because of these associations with sinewy, I was startled to find the label â€Å"Sinewy Delta† under the photo of a river delta in the Yukon. The photo showed a complex convergence of winding rivers that from the air resembled veins visible on the back of an old person’s hand or the diagram of a network of capillaries. As I explored the Web, I discovered that some people use sinewy instead of the more conventional adjective sinuous to describe things- usually rivers- that are characterized by curves, twists, and turns. Sinuous derives from the Latin noun sinus: a bending, a curve, a fold. I do not rule out the possibility that strong currents or rough waves might suggest musculature, but the following examples clearly use sinewy where sinuous would be more apt: The outboard motor gurgled and rumbled as they worked their way out of the sinewy river mouth, curving left, passing jutting boulders as they moved toward the  open water of Big Bay de Noc. Next time you enjoy a float down the sinewy channels of the Winooski or Lamoille river, note where each bend and twist occurs. In this area, the sinewy Delaware River takes some of its most interesting bends as it proceeds on its journey south to the Atlantic Ocean. Interesting things happen at the juncture of different mediums: between field and water, the shape of a river, its sinewy curve, is defined. The Little Manatee River still follows the same winding, sinewy course it has for centuries. The mouth of the Sibun is dominated by mangroves and a winding, sinewy track. I suppose that speakers who associate the word sinew with the image of cord-like tendons in a pattern resembling a collection of veins might describe a delta as â€Å"sinewy,† but I suspect theyre in a minority. I rather think that a more usual reason writers describe a curving river as sinewy is that they are mixing the word up with sinuous. sinewy: muscular sinuous: curving and twisting Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:25 Subordinating Conjunctions20 Pairs of One-Word and Two-Word Formsâ€Å"Least,† â€Å"Less,† â€Å"More,† and â€Å"Most†

Sunday, November 3, 2019

Report on the BOOTS and ALLIANCE in talks over 7.5bn merger Essay

Report on the BOOTS and ALLIANCE in talks over 7.5bn merger - Essay Example The other company, which is inching towards the deal, is Alliance UniChem, which has an estimated market worth of nearly 3.2bn. The company conducts extensive wholesale operations all over the UK, Netherlands, Norway & Italy in the field of Drug Trade with the presence of nearly upto 1200 pharmacies throughout these countries. Over the last one year, the de-regulation of the market in the Pharmaceutical Sector has resulted in a stiffer competition in the high street market among retailing companies. Companies and Supermarkets now have the liberty to set up in-store pharmacies, which poses a danger to key pharmaceutical players like BOOTS and Alliance. In an analysis published in biotech-info.net- "Due to the softening of rules and the law, BOOTS is facing stiff competition from other pharmaceutical retailing majors such as TESCO, which enjoyed and continues to enjoy a place of dominance and monopoly in the market". Tougher competition from the supermarkets has forced Mr. Baker of BOOTS to cut the price of his products in an attempt to prop up the so far lukewarm sales, although this has put some further pressure on the profit and operating margins. As such, both the firms have decided that it is time to join hands in order to compete effectively in the market and also to improve upon their current individual deficiencies. The present deal is expected to give the new firm an industry share of nearly upto 20%. But the present deal has been met with a lot of speculation especially from the institutional shareholders who generally regard such nil-premium mergers with skepticism. The companies therefore intend to seek support for the deal by outlining the capacity of the new merged outfit's capacity to generate significant cost and purchasing synergies and boost

Friday, November 1, 2019

The Prime Minister of Russian Federation Vladimir Putin is great Essay

The Prime Minister of Russian Federation Vladimir Putin is great public speaker. Russia needs him - Essay Example His speeches are interesting, focused, and witty he makes use of a number of metaphors in them. His unique body posture, tone modulations, assertiveness, conviction, openness, boldness and diplomatic strategies make him one of my favorite public speakers. The five elements involved in effective public speaking are, â€Å"who is saying what to whom using what medium with what effects?† (The Definition of Public Speaking). Analyzing Putin’s speeches one can identify that they combine these elements to a large extend. For Jaffe, â€Å"public speaking occurs when one person prepares and delivers a speech for a group that listens, generally without interrupting the speaker’s flow of ideas†( Jaffe, 2009, p. 1). In the case of Vladimir Putin his words are highly valued not only by the Russians but also by the international community and as such he can be regarded as an effective public speaker. Vladimir Putin’s historical speech at the Security Conference in Munich, on February 10, 2007 has captured worldwide attention. Addressing the large number of defense ministers, parliamentarians and other representatives Putin strongly criticized the United States in trying to create a "uni-polar" world. In his short but powerful speech he severely condemns the United States that has â€Å"overstepped its borders in all spheres - economic, political and humanitarian, and has imposed itself on other states† and he warns world nations that the United States’ policy would only result in disasters (Watson, 2007). Vladimir Putin’s speeches demonstrate immense optimism and he firmly believes in the potential power of the nation’s political system. While may criticize that there is no modernization in the nation, the nation was stagnating and that corruption goes unchecked in the nation, Putin has defended himself effectively by citing the concrete deeds undertaken by the government. He