Effective and Efficient Methods of Background Investigation and Reference Checking

A great business relies on talented, highly skilled, and hardworking employees that continue target goals and pommel them. Hiring the take up employees for a business however, is not a simple assess. It requires sifting through the vast manpower and getting alone the best of the best for the production results one desires. Intelligent and rough-and-ready human resources counseling feigns two practices that guarantee the pile consumed fit their positions to a T solid ground investigating and cite baffleing.The three to the highest degree effective way of lifes of background probe and extension microprocessor chiping ar mail, by tele border, and in soul. In the world of human resources management now, there is no universal agreement on what the price background investigation and indication checking mean (Barada and McLaughlin 1). The term background check may mean the akin thing as a background investigation, but there be also near people who interchange th e terms with each other. It may be definitive to distinguish between background investigation and elongation checking however, to clarify the following discussion.Background investigation involves verifying the accuracy of the data provided by a antic appli put forwardt through his resume or cover letter. In a way, it serves as the companys first defense against potential fraud from excogitate vistas. The person or group assigned the t pack of background investigation makes sure that a particular trick applier has not deceived the company most the details of his cover letter or resume. As an initial screening device, a background check also serves the purpose of decreasing the number of resumes and cover letters on the likely employers table.Through the circumspect elimination of job applicants who seem to provide doubtful information on their job applications, the prospective employer can arrive at a shorter list of campaigners to consider. These candidates job applica tions are theoretic each(prenominal)y more credible than the others that reserve been discarded. Background investigation though, strictly speaking, is very different from cite checking. The prospective employer doesnt evaluate a candidates past job carrying into action during a background investigation.However, background investigation does involve t asks such as verification of current and former job positions, dates of employment, educational information, and professional licenses claimed, if any (Barada and McLaughlin 4). there are many ways to conduct background investigations, including by phone, through the Internet, and by hiring a background investigation firm. The simplest way would be to phone institutions mentioned by the candidate in his resume. For example, if a candidate claims that he has an MA in business management from a particular university, the police detective could phone that university and verify the information.Background investigation by phone is ver y effective and efficient beca aim the investigator consumes little time and effort in confirming the details on the resume. The people concerned can also process any questions the investigator may strike regarding the candidates background. Another way to conduct background investigation is to use of undecomposeds and services Internet resources to verify the information on the candidates resume and cover letter. Many schools forthwith provide information on their websites regarding their students and programs.Some may have downloadable newsletters that the investigator could sift through to confirm the candidates information. The investigator may also send an e-mail to people concerned, asking them to reply when its most convenient to them. There are companies today who hand over the task of background checking to specialize background investigation firms. These firms help their clients to hire better employees by steering them clear of candidates who lie on their resumes. I ndustry experts estimate that thirty percent of all resumes contain falsifications or misrepresentations.Most of these are located in the education section of a resume. A background investigation firm can help their clients intensify their work beam security, reduce turnover, minimize the risk of employee theft, and provide assurance to the prospective employers decisiveness regarding hiring a candidate or not (Falcone 122). wing checking, in contrast with background investigation, is an objective assessment of an applicants past job performance based on information collected from the applicants previous employers (Barada and McLauglin 2).Prospective employers usually do fictional character checks during the final stages of the hiring process to assess applicants on their list of job finalists (Kleiman 163). Among the many uses of audience checking is the collection of clear testimonials that support a prospective employers decision to hire an applicant, and the revelation of fa ctors that the employer and applicant may have not discussed during the interview (Andler and Herbst 157). Reference checking has many other benefits, which depart be discussed later.The three most effective ways to conduct reference checks is in person, by telephone, and by mail. Among these, the most effective way to gather information is through a face-to-face discussion with a character reference. This method has several advantages over others. First, you can verify if such a person does follow and that the character didnt deceivingly asked a friend of his to impersonate a boss for example who he claims to be extremely proud of his work. When conducting a reference check in person, it is a good scheme to talk to the character reference first through the telephone.It may be more appropriate to do this when considering a candidate for an executive position which may have a huge impact on the companys overall performance. The reference should be asked if he is pull up stakesing to meet the human resources object lesson at his office for a brief parley about his previous employer. The representative could also ask the previous employer if he is willing to talk over lunch or a cup of coffee. The of import thing is not to pressure the character reference into agreeing to the meeting. He should agree wholeheartedly about the proposition.Its also not right to deceive the character reference about the meeting. He should be understandably informed of what the meeting will be all about. During the meeting, he should not be pressured to reveal information on the candidate. It is best to have a ready list of questions to ask the character reference, so the conversation will not venture off to un demand topics, consuming the references precious time. era face-to-face reference checks are extremely informative about the job candidate, it is very obvious that it also consumes too much time, energy, and money to execute.A human resource representative would have to travel from one place to another just to secure interviews from the character references. He would also have to spend the companys money during these short conversations. It is therefore not that efficient as a means of checking character references. The most efficient method of reference checking is by telephone. The human resources representative in this case doesnt have to go anywhere and can remain in the office while checking character references. There are many ways by which a representative can do reference checking by phone.One effective method is called the exact-time method (Andler and Herbst 186). In this method, the representative first calls the character reference asking him what time would be convenient for him to talk a little bit about his previous employee, for example. The representative wherefore establishes an exact-time by which he would call the person again, and so proceeds to call him exactly at the time specified. concord to experiments done by Andler a nd Herbst, the exact-time method has an interesting effect on character references.Once the representative tells a person that hell be calling again at a particular time, the person somehow is bring forth to sit all day beside the telephone waiting for the call. In their experiments, some were even annoyed because they waited for the phone to ring at the time specified. This works to the prospective employers advantage because interviews with character references are then easier to secure. The possibility of missing them because theyve just had lunch or went to another place is lessened, making the reference check more efficient.References may also be pleased by the professionalism of the representative through this method since he shows that he is willing to work with their schedules (Andler and Herbst 187). The oldest way of checking references is by mail. Although the method is still being used today by new and old companies, it is obvious that checking references by mail is bot h time-consuming and ineffective as a means of gathering information. There are many difficulties associated with reference checking, including choosing the right people to do the job, dealing with the references themselves, and making sure no law is transgressed in the process.While reference checking is an essential part of the hiring process, some companies that are more administrative than results-oriented avoid reference checks by telephone or in person to cut risks (Andler and Herbst 187). This is not advisable to prospective employers because investing in the most credible candidates is an important way to secure the future of any business. Reference checking through snail mail is virtually futile. Previous employers could be expected to be slow in answering questions that the prospective employer sent them. Many of them many not answer at all.Research shows that the return rate of reference checking by mail can be as high as fifty-six percent and as low as eighteen percent. One motive for the very low return rate is that previous employers are afraid that their employees may sue them for divine revelation information in written form (Andler and Herbst 187-188). When checking references by mail, it is advisable that e-mail be used preferably than snail mail. This would make the character reference more comfortable with writing the information that he knows because he doesnt have to write it on a tangible piece of paper.Hell just type all the necessary bits of information on the e-mail and then send it back. The questionnaire should be written as to retard the character reference that theyre violating no law in the activity and that records of the prospective employee will be competently guarded. Whether by phone, by mail or in person, there are many ways to conduct reference checks. Some companies hire other agencies to do reference checks and background investigation for them. Others though, use their own human resources departments to do the job.On e good strategy though is for the managing director for whom the job applicant will work to call the previous employers himself. Thus, reference checking is not done through the human resources department or any other agency but directly (Rosenberg 241). It is very advantageous to conduct a reference check through the manager than the human resources department because the candidate will eventually have to answer to the manager when he gets hired, not to the human resources department. The manager will know what questions about job performance to ask the character references.A human resources representative wouldnt have this kind of knowledge and would likely hardly be concerned with the legal issues the company might face in conducting the reference check (Rosenberg 241). The manager can talk to character references by phone, mail or in person, but it is most recommended that he talks to them by phone for efficiency and more results. One problem with any kind of reference check i s that the character references may want to withhold or change information regarding a candidate.Former employers are usually reluctant to reveal information, sometimes only providing the candidates date of employment and job title. Some of them may also want to reveal only information thats favorable to the candidate even if its not true (Kleiman 164). The reason why previous employers and other character references are usually reluctant to share information on a candidate is because they fear they could be sued for opprobrium by the candidate.Some candidates do sue their character references, blaming them for their failure to secure a job position. Its late to get around this problem though, by clearly explaining to the character reference that he can prevail himself against any defamation suits by only revealing information that is factual and objective. He should also only share the information to interested parties and not anyone outside of the transaction. The interview mol diness also completely orbit around topics that are job-related and nothing else (Kleiman 164).While there are companies today who skip reference checking because of legal concerns and the flavour that references would only reveal information favorable to the candidate, reference checking is still essential as an investment for the companys future. Reference checking is an effective strategy to predict the future job performance and behavior of a candidate based on the testimonials of other parties that have seen his work out front (Kleiman 163). Theres continuously a risk in hiring people, and reference checking supports a prospective employers decision to hire a particular candidate.Conducting a reference check makes a prospective employer feel better about the decision he made regarding hiring a candidate. Reference checks may also reveal information that has not been revealed before during the candidates interview. That information may be helpful or disadvantageous to the ca ndidates application, but it is ultimately the prospective employer that benefits from the supplementary information. Information like the candidate is a very good mother, very health conscious, or that shes pleasant to work with may be revealed during a reference check.The character reference may also give some advice on where the candidate excels best. You can then consider his advice and put him in a position where hell likely perform in the best way possible (Andler and Herbst 157). Whatever means you choose to conduct a reference check, it is absolutely necessary to keep the conversation about the job position the candidate is applying for. Common topics addressed during a reference check include the candidates dates of employment, job titles he held, rate of pay, attendance, and performance evaluations.The prospective employer may also ask the reference about the candidates behavior, what character traits he possesses or if he has any discipline problems. Its also important to inquire about the candidates expertness to get along with his colleagues and his general strengths and weaknesses. The prospective employer may also inquire about the candidates reason for leaving if the character reference knows anything about it and is willing to share that information. Finally, he could also ask him whether hes willing to rehire the candidate or not.In our opinion, it is not only prospective and previous employers who should be conscious of the necessity of background investigations and reference checks. All employees and job applicants should also recognize that an efficient and made company relies on credible, talented and hardworking people to accomplish goals and targets. Instead of being too untrusting of background investigation and reference checks, and thinking about suing their former employers for revealing information about them, they must accept the fact that both procedures are essential to ensure the health of their industry.They must act on the ir own and provide only truthful information on their job applications. Background investigation and reference checking will always be essential to the performance of a company. Both of these procedures can now be more efficiently and effectively done with the use of modern resources like the Internet. While employers, both prospective and previous, may continue to confront lawsuits from employees or job applicants, it is necessary to continue the practices of background investigation and reference checking for the benefit of any industry.Without these procedures, industries will perform poorly because of the increased chance of hiring the wrong people for important positions. Whether by phone, by mail, in person, through the Internet or through a private investigation firm, it is advisable for any company to conduct background investigations and reference checks for improved performance in the future. plant life Cited Ades, Leslie J. Managing Mavericks the Art of Sales focusing. Dubuqe McGraw-Hill Professional, 2004. Adler, Lou. Hire with Your Head Using mathematical operation-Based Hiring to Build Great Teams. Hoboken John Wiley and Sons, 2007.Andler, Edward C. and Herbst, Dara. The Complete Reference Checking Handbook The Proven (and Legal) Way to Prevent Hiring Mistakes. Atlanta AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2002. Barada, Paul William J. and McLaughlin, Michael. Reference Checking for Everyone What You Need to sock to Protect yourself, your Business, and your Family. Dubuqe McGraw-Hill Professional, 2004. Berman, Evan M. , et al. Human Resource Management in Public Service Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems. Thousand Oaks SAGE, 2005. Branham, Leigh. Keeping the commonwealth who Keep you in Business 24 Ways to Hang On to your Most Valuable Talent.Atlanta AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2001. Dinteman, Walter Anthony. Zero Defect Hiring a Quick Guide to the Most Important Decisions Managers Have to Make. Hoboken John Wiley and Sons, 2003. Enos, Darryl D . Performance Improvement Making it Happen, Second Edition. New York CRC Press, 2007. Falcone, Paul. The Hiring and Firing Question and Answer Book. Atlanta AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2001. Fischer, Robert J. and Gion Green. universe to Society. Saint Louis Elsevier, 1998. Herman, Susan J. Hiring right a practical guide. Thousand Oaks SAGE, 1993. Kleiman, Lawrence.Human Resource Management A Managerial bill for Competitive Advantage Third Edition. Daryaganj Wiley-India, 2003. Loen, Raymond O. Superior Supervision the 10% Solution. Lanham Lexington Books, 1994. Marshall, Don R. The Four Elements of Successful Management Select, Direct, Evaluate, Reward. Atlanta AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 1998. Moran, Greg and Patrick Longo. Hire, Fire, and the Walking Dead Recruiters Guide to Hiring the Best. El Monte Academic Learning friendship LLC, 2006. Pritchard, Christopher W. 101 Strategies for Recruiting Success Where, When, and How to Find the Right People Every Time.Atlanta AMACO M Div American Mgmt Assn, 2006. Rosenberg, DeAnne. A Managers Guide to Hiring the Best Person for Every Job. Hoboken John Wiley & Sons, 2000. Stone, Florence M. The Managers Question and Answer Book. Atlanta AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 2003. Voros, Sharon and Philippe De Backer. The alley to Ceo The Worlds Leading Executive Recruiters Identify the Traits You Need to Make It to the Top. Cincinnati Adams Media, 2002. Widmann, Nancy C. , et al. I Didnt See It Coming The sole(prenominal) Book Youll Ever Need to Avoid Being Blindsided in Business. Hoboken John Wiley and Sons, 2007.