Tort law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Tort law - Essay ExampleBasically, a tort law hatful be described as a civil wrong not arising from a contr fiddle and in the trip of nonperformance, one should owe due consideration to ones neighbour (Capiro Industries vs. Dickman 1990). It generally refers to the duty of palm owed by somebody to his or her neighbour. Cooke (2010) suggests that in the event that it can be proved beyond some(prenominal) reason equal to(p) doubt by the court that the complainant has suffered a civil injustice, a claim can be raised and a remedy in the form of compensation can be instituted. On the other hand, disuse can be described as a civil wrong arising from the act of negligence by doing something a reasonable man would not do and a plaintiff must prove that the defendant owes a duty of thrill (Donoghue V. Stevenson 1932). It is of paramount importance for the plaintiff to be able to prove that the defendant had duty to take care of and that duty of care has been breached in order to produce the claim. In order to prove the existence of day care duty, some conditions should prevail where a defendant can be taken to task if this duty is breached. Under the baptismal font of Capiro Industries vs. ... In the above case of Ultramares Corporation v Touche (1931) 255 NY 170), the facts are Justice Cardozo created a special rule with regards to controls and auditors. He suggested that mass obligation should not exist but that only the invitee and the intended third party could fuddle an restrainer liable for the accountants negligence (Wegman 2007). Thus the court must be careful especially when it comes to establish negligence in the case involving an unmarked amount of money for an unfixed time with regards to an indefinite third part. An accountant can facilitate a loan transaction between a financial institution and a third party and in this case, only the financial institution and the third party can hold the accountant liable in the event of losses as a resu lt of negligence. In this case, negligence is a common form of tort law which can be punishable if carelessness is proved and the victim will be entitled to get compensation. Failure to protect others from harm as a result of somebodys conduct is known as negligence whereby a duty care will have been ignored. From the above explanation of tort, it is clear that the accountant in this particular case has a duty care to make sure that their actions do result in financial losses to the client or the other third party which can be the plaintiff. With regards to this normal test, it does not always result that duty care is owed by the third party which may result in loss of something which requires the plaintiff to prove that the resultant loss has been a result of the action of the accountant. In the case of Paris v Stepney Borough Council (1951) the editor of Salmond on the Law